How We Rank Vendors

We don't test peptides. We test vendors — on whether they're willing to show you the receipts.

Our Vendor Transparency Score (A-E) is based entirely on independently verifiable signals. We don't license third-party testing data. We don't factor in affiliate relationships. Every signal we use can be checked by anyone with a web browser.

Five transparency signals

We evaluate vendors on five signals, split into two categories. Core evidence signals directly measure whether a vendor is willing to show you proof of testing. Supporting trust signals add context about business legitimacy.

How We Score Transparency

Public COA AccessCore evidenceCertificates of Analysis visible on site with batch-specific results
Batch TraceabilityCore evidenceCOA batch numbers match product labels and packaging
Named Testing LabCore evidenceTesting lab is named and independently verifiable
Policy PagesSupporting trustDedicated refund and/or shipping policy pages
Identifiable OwnershipSupporting trustNamed founders, registered business, or physical address
Methodology v2.0 · Last updated Mar 14, 2026Full methodology →

How signals become grades

Each signal is scored 0 (not found), 0.5 (partial or claimed but unverifiable), or 1.0 (confirmed). The total score ranges from 0 to 5.

A4.0-5.0 + 2 core signals, or all 3 core signals
B3.0-3.5
C2.0-2.5
D0.5-1.5
E0 or disqualified

Negative signal overrides

Some behaviors override the additive score entirely:

  • Fabricated COAs or fake lab claims — automatic E grade, regardless of other signals.
  • Verifiably false claims (e.g., inflated years in business) — one-grade deduction from the calculated grade.
  • Official enforcement action + closure — vendor is marked “Archived” and removed from the active grading ladder.

What we don't factor in

  • Product purity or quality. We grade transparency, not peptides. We are not a testing lab.
  • Third-party testing data. We don't license data from testing services. Our scores are based on what vendors themselves publish and what we can independently verify.
  • Reddit/community sentiment. We read it. We reference it as flavor. But we never let anonymous forum posts move a score.
  • Affiliate status. Whether we earn commissions from a vendor has zero effect on their score. See our full affiliate disclosure.

Industry context

No vendor in the peptide space currently holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for peptide assay testing. Our methodology accounts for this industry-wide gap — we evaluate vendors relative to what's achievable, not against pharmaceutical-grade standards that no one meets.

Versioning

Our methodology is versioned. Every vendor profile shows which version was used to calculate their score and when it was last updated. When we change the methodology, we re-score all vendors and publish what changed.

Current version: v2.0 · Last updated: March 14, 2026